So I created a roleplay some time ago and twice I became ill while trying to start it. Both times I got maybe six players. Now I only have one if you don’t count me. If you like the Insane Journal format (or if yu could care less either way) and you like dark asylum-based games, you might enjoy Tranquility Falls.

I’m not the kind of mod who wants you to join only with pretty characters who get lots of sex all the time because they’re just that sexy/have a sex addiction as an excuse to sex everyone in the asylum. I don’t care who you choose to be the face for your characters, as long as they’re not someone like, say, your friend or your mother. Tranquility Falls is about the plot  and the writing, with plenty of room for other players to get involved in creating major plot points. It’s not about how gorgeous your icons are or how young your characters are; it’s not about me and my plot and everyone listening to me. It’s about a team coming together to write a great character-driven story.

If you are interested, the premise can be found here, the holds/taken page is here, the drop box if you wish to contact me is right here and over here you’ll find the FAQs. Everything else you need is found here at the mod journal.

So come on in, take a look around, see if there’s anything that takes your interest. I really want the game to be successful this time around.

And while you’re at it, get your eyes washed. I don’t watch the X-Factor often. I try not to, because the amount of crap that gets through to the finals gives me a nasty pain in my head and my heart sinks just a bit further into my stomach every year. This week, however, it’s Queen week, and if there was ever a singer I idolised it’s Freddie Mercury. What a cheek, then, that they would decide that in the month of the anniversary of Mercury’s death to let the contestants ruin what were beautiful, powerful, emotional and energetic songs the way they did. You know, I watched last week. What was Louis Walsh thinking? Ghostbusters? I’d rather watch a cat choking on its own vomit that see them perform the Ghostbusters theme again, and the sad thing is, in the right hands and with the right kind of showmanship, that theme could have been fun. John and Edward have neither talent nor showmanship, and believe it or not, they’re not actually good at rapping, either. The Offspring couldn’t have put how I feel about them in better words than this.

Really, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, how does a big old karaoke game count as entertainment, for television, no less? I mean, television isn’t great nowadays, but it’s not necessary to make it worse.

Whoever it was that decided that Stacey’s horribly edited version of Who Wants To Live Forever? (linked to Queen’s beautiful version) was passable needs a good kick in the face. Freddie didn’t end WWTLF? with a wail of “FOREEVEERRRRRRR!!” and neither should she have. The lyrics are so few that she could have sung every last one of them and still made it her own, and instead we got a monotonous repeat of “WHO WAAAANTS TO LIIIIVE FOREEEVeeEEEeeRRRRrrrRRrrrr!!?!” Well, let me just say, if living forever means having to hear Queen murdered by the finalists every year for the rest of my life, I certainly don’t want to live forever.

And how could you cheer that awful, puffed-out Don’t Stop Me Now? What is wrong with you, Britain? What’s wrong with Brian May and Roger Taylor that they didn’t hear how bad the singers were when they were training? They worked with Freddie Mercury, for crying out loud!

The worst by far, of course, were John and Edward. Louis has been bitching lately about how “waaaaaaaa everyone else is cheating and using songs I don’t know waaaaaa”. Well, you know something Louis, they weren’t cheating, but you certainly did. You had your boys go out there and destroy Freddie, David Bowie, and though I didn’t think it possible, they managed to destroy Vanilla Ice as well. What a hypocrite – using a song that wasn’t even a Queen song. Sure, it sampled a Queen song. But it wasn’t really Queen.

But then again, none of the performances tonight were Queen. They don’t even come close to Queen and Paul Rodgers, which to me is like a watered-down Queen in the first place.

Freddie Mercury will be 18 years dead on the 24th November. Do yourselves a favour on that day, British public, and go listen to some real music. Remember him as a musician by listening to a track that he is singing on, that he had creative influence over, that he helped write, don’t listen to the forced screechings of some talentless glorified karaoke singers. I’d bet that if Freddie hadn’t been cremated, he’d be spinning in his grave.

Oh, and not wanting to end on a down note, here’s a song by Queen I love :] Sung by Freddie, written by John Deacon:

I saw Inglourious Basterds on its opening night here in the UK and I plan to review it eventually. One thing I have to say about it though is that there are already fangirls for the bad guy!

Anyone who saw the movie knows that Col. Landa is a manipulative, back-stabbing opportunist. He is not a nice guy. He looks for ways that he can benefit in any situation and is prepared to take the cowards’ way out. He is aggressive and cruel when he wants to be. He kills an entire family of Jews in a surprise attack, for crying out loud!

He is not going to change his ways for your character. He is not going to become kind and loving and caring and sweet for your Mary-Sue, self-insert, prettiful and gorgeous, awesomely brave and awesome character. I actually hope that Christoph Waltz, dressed as Landa, comes round to your house and in a blaze of bullets destroys your computer for that. I hope Quentin Tarantino then arrives and stomps on the remains.

End of post. For now.

I’m a little perplexed that the readers of my blog find it using phrases like ‘joker fangirl’, ‘anneliese van der pol boobs’ and ‘”crush on” hertzfeldt’.

And the other day, it was found using the phrase ‘bundy/dahmer slash’. You people… need help.

Promotional poster for the US tour

Promotional poster for the US tour

Two weeks before June 21st 2009, my sister was browsing the internet and suddenly squealed in delight. Or so I hear; I had been at work at the time, but I’m assured it was a powerful moment when she discovered that one of her most favourite animators was premiering his latest animated short in Edinburgh. Upon returning home I was asked if I wanted to tag along to An Evening With Don Hertzfeldt. She couldn’t go on her own, so I agreed.

Two weeks later, I found myself on a train to Edinburgh after finishing a six hour shift in the slave factory in which I am employed. Not feeling too well, I sat with my sister across from a very nice gentleman with whom we had an interesting conversation about the arts, science, BP and patriotism going too far. After getting off the train, we made our way to pick up the tickets and then it was off to the cinema where we would see the premiere of Hertzfeldt’s film I Am So Proud Of You, the second in a trilogy of shorts about a man named Bill who is apparently very unwell, as well as a selection of his earlier works.

Now, when I tagged along, it was as a guardian. My sister is a big girl and can take care of herself but I couldn’t have her going to a strange city on her lonesome. I wasn’t particularly interested in seeing the sequel to Everything Will Be Ok, which I viewed with my sister at her friend’s house.  It had been good, yes, but I was pretty soured to the whole Hertzfeldt animation thing by the clips floating around the bowels of the internet, specifically the random segment involving a small stick-like figure holding a massive spoon and standing in front of a tiny bowl as he declared that “mah spoon is tew biiig” in a high pitched voice, when suddenly and giant banana walks into the room and announces that “I am a banana.” Out of context, that only served to piss me off. Suffice it to say that I was not looking forward to the show at all, other that the fact the the animator himself would be there and I was hoping to ask him “What. The. Fuck?”

Just as we are getting herded into the cinema room, my sister gasps and freezes.

“That’s him,” he breathes, looking as though she is in the presence of Zombie Freddie Mercury himself. I look around confused, not sure who I’m looking for. Frustrated, my sister garbles some unknown fangirl language and points at a guy standing right next to us, sporting a beard of sorts and a green jacket. That, I am informed in not-so-nice language, is Don Hertzfeldt. He looks sort of generic to me, and we finally go into the cinema and choose seats in the third row. I find myself utterly interested in the shots of the animator’s scribbles and planning sheets flashing up on the screen in a cycle. As my sister points out, so does the animator.

A sequence from The Meaning of Life

A sequence from The Meaning of Life

After a short introduction, the films start. We are first of all treated to The Meaning Of Life, an apparently non-structured bundle of sequences that relate to one another in a disjointed fashion. I’m no artist, but I enjoy it, and the audience laughs along. I don’t know why, but I find I laugh hardest when a portly character walks across the screen declaring his love for fishsticks, and when a strange creature chastises a younger creature for talking about the “Meaning of Life”. The audience claps heartily when that animation finishes and wait intently for the next: Rejected.

Rejected is a brilliant idea. It represents Hertzfeldt’s feelings toward being asked to animate advertisements for companies, and shows that it’s probably not a good idea to ask him to do ads for you. (Hertzfeldt comments in dismay during the interview at the end that “Even after I made Rejected, people are still asking me.”) Some of the fake ads include a sequence for the Family Learning Channel in which a man in an ordinary hat walks unsuspectingly into a Silly Hats Only area. After the ‘You Are Watching the Family Learning Channel’ card, we are shown the result – the poor guy gets lynched by the silly-hat-wearers. Also in the Family Learning Channel segment is the “mah spoon is tew big” sequence, which turns out to be a whole lot funnier in context. The film ends in the animator apparently having a nervous breakdown and all the characters literally suffering as a result. A comical, but powerful, short film.

In case you hadnt noticed, his spoon is too big.

In case you hadn't noticed, his spoon is too big.

Next was Billy’s Balloon, a seemingly innocent short that starts out with a small, unattended child playing quite happily with a rattle and holding a red balloon. Laughter erupts when the balloon suddenly and inexplicably begins to attack the boy. The hilarity just seems to escalate when the balloon stops abusing the child when adults walk by. After that, it just gets better when the balloon proceeds to lift the boy way up into the cloudy sky… and very deliberately drop him from plane-height. Repeatedly.

After this, we see Intermission in the Third Dimension. I’ll be honest, I have no idea what this even is. It looks like it’s making fun of 3D films (complete with 3D glasses) at first and then it becomes this bizarre seizure-tastic journey into the dimension of insanity. Still funny though. To myself, I’m wondering if Scottish people aren’t just a bit mental; we’ve laughed at everything so far.

Then comes Everything Will Be Ok, the first in a trilogy of films following Bill, a middle-aged man who is very sick with… er… We’re never told what it actually is, but whatever it is, it gives him awful symptoms, including hallucinations, paranoid delusions and apparent seizures. Bill’s life seems to be mundane and uninteresting, but it is that which makes his experiences all the more fascinating to watch. People can relate to the simple stick-like figure, and everyone in the audience receives the film in a different, very much individual way. The reaction to each comedic sequence in Everything Will Be Ok is met as before with a ripple of laughter (some of it uneasy) throughout the audience, whereas each symptom we suffer with Bill as he tries to battle his illness is met with a solemn silence. Captivated, the audience is undoubtedly gaining some sort of newfound wisdom, finally understanding what their life is really all about, or maybe mentally reminding themselves that they have work in the morning. Whatever the case, the film’s end credits are met with the same roaring round of respectful applause as each of the last films.

Finally, we are all treated to the very first UK showing of the new film I Am So Proud Of You. This film explores Bill’s ironic and macabre family history in a deadpan and fantastical fashion. With his family just as messed up as he seems to be, it is really no wonder Bill turned out the way he did. Medically, that is. I don’t usually like to get personal, but this film moved me in a very strong way. Other people in the audience later remarked on the powerful feelings evoked by Hertzfeldt’s spectacular storytelling, a style made even more impressive when he tells us later that “I make it up as I go”. His films, particularly Everything Will Be Ok and I Am So Proud Of You, are clever, witty and masterful, but they are at the same time not overbearing, not dry or formulaic and most definitely not patronising. His films invite you to watch for yourself and try to take what you will of it. What you see in it is not forced; instead, you must figure what it means to you. Watching his films, you can feel alone in a crowded room, you can feel blissfully ignorant to the world around you, you can feel as though your life is mapped out somewhere within the philosophy and thoughtfulness of this incredible animator’s work and so much more. Conversely, you can also feel like you’re wasting your time watching an unstructured child’s stream of consciousness when you could be at home watching something mindless on the television, in which case, these films are probably not for you.

At the credits for I Am So Proud Of You, there is an extended version of that respectful applause, amplified as it seems that everybody present got something out of the experience. Don Hertzfeldt is ushered to the front of the room, looking jet-lagged and somewhat frightened. His presence is a surprise; unlike many filmmakers, he is not intimidating. (My sister would beg to differ, of course, as she later took the mic to declare that “Your films terrify me”, which was met by a retiring “Thank you”) His body language is not threatening; he is on the audience’s level, and yet I have never seen someone look more shocked in my entire life. His eyes are perpetually wide and large as a deer caught in headlights and his pose is unassuming. He apologises to the audience for his appearance; he is tired and now he has to stand for an extended period of time (“Animators don’t stand up a lot…”) but he has, he assures us, enjoyed watching us watching the films. He is asked various questions by the host, one about the way in which his films provoke strong and different reactions from his audiences. He responds to this question by expressing distaste at Hollywood filmmakers who assume that their audiences are idiots, and try to force them into a reaction (“…they might have this extreme close-up, and it’s like ‘Cry, damn you, cry!’”), which he doesn’t want to do.  Asked about the internet (which, in my opinion, made him better known than he could have hoped to be without it) he answers in his odd, ranting way that he doesn’t like films to be on the internet, though he won’t hunt down those who put his older stuff up for others to enjoy. Continuing on this rant, he begins to talk about the increasing number of films available on mobile phones and remarks with seething bitterness that “There is no art student out there who wants to make her film debut on a fucking phone!”

It actually is a deer in headlights. It just resembles Hertzfeldt.

Deer In Headligh-- er, I mean, Don Hertzfeldt signing a poster

Later, it is time to answer audience questions. My sister takes the mic and compliments him on his terrifying films. She asks if he would consider live action and then cheekily asks for some advice on becoming a filmmaker. Hertzfeldt says that he would consider live action and then announces that “this is where I say I don’t know anything and then I won’t stop talking”. His advice is long and ranting like most of his speech, but it is certainly different to the usual “be the best you can be” speeches other filmmakers seem to have shared between them. He states that it is those who are willing to work hard, to spend a lot of time on their art, to practically live in their workspace and not come out except for food or coffee are those who will succeed. His speech is not easy to listen to if you happen to have a stomach threatening to empty its contents all over the three rows in front including the poor animator and host due to the aforementioned sickness, but it is poignant and passionate and very genuine.

After this, we are all invited to purchase some DVDs and have them signed by Hertzfeldt, who in person was charming and sincere. As we parted ways, he wished my sister the best of luck and we were able to return home, but home was truly furthest from my mind. Even as I lay my poor, sick head down to sleep that night (and many subsequent nights), all I could think of was those films we had watched and how they had, indeed, affected me and imprinted themselves on me in such a shocking and powerful way. I have a newfound appreciation for independent film, especially animation, and after being brought so close to a wave of conflicting emotions during I Am So Proud Of You, I can proudly and safely say that I am in terrible anticipation for the next installment of this thought-provoking, wondrous trilogy.

What has two thumbs and a brilliant mind?

I give it two thumbs up, too.

Don Hertzfeldt’s production company website, including information on his films and a blog updated regularly by the animator is at www.bitterfilms.com

United States President Barack Obama got a cute, cuddly young doggy a while ago. If you’ve been tuned into the world lately, you probably already know that. You probably also know then that PeTA, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, recently requested that Obama get Bo (a Portugese water dog) neutered, despite the fact that Bo was already neutered when the family received him.

Now, I have nothing against dogs being neutered. My shelter dog has been neutered. I do, however, have something against PeTA. They always criticise those who generally don’t talk back.

Remember Steve Irwin? Here’s what PeTA’s Dan Mathews had to say about his death:

“He made a career out of antagonising wild animals, which is a very dangerous message to send to kids. [...] If you compare him with a responsible conservationist like Jacques Cousteau, he looks like a cheap reality TV star.”

No condolences, no well-wishes to a grieving family. Yes, I also think his death was most likely his own idiotic fault, but that doesn’t make it any less tragic.

And now they’re targeting Canada, widely stereotyped as a benign, peaceful place:

You can help end Canada’s annual war on seals by boycotting a product that is vital to the country’s economy: maple syrup. Canada produces approximately 85 percent of the world’s maple syrup, with the U.S. as its largest consumer, and by buying this Canadian product, you are supporting Canadian cruelty. By pledging to boycott Canadian maple syrup, you’ll be speaking up for baby seals in Canada, for whom life isn’t so sweet, and telling Canada that you won’t support its product until you can support its practices.

Um… You’ll be stopping their fur trade by not buying maple syrup? Something tells me that’s not going to work. It didn’t work the last time they pointed out the “ebilness” of the trade. I don’t like it either, but I’m still going to buy maple syrup.

But that’s not all. Ever noticed that they don’t criticise people like Vladimir Putin? Maybe it’s because he banned seal hunting in his own country, but I’m still amazed that when the Russian Prime Minister received a baby tiger for his birthday last year, they didn’t even bat an eyelid. Okay, he did say that he would have a good home found for her. As evil as many of us believe the guy is, it has to be said that he really loves his animals. But really, after Putin was reported to have shot a tiger (with a tranquiliser dart), possibly as a publicity stunt, I’m surprised they didn’t all grab their laptops and begin writing stupid threatening or demeaning letters to this guy. Not only that, but his country absolutely thrives in the fur trade. Look at all the cute silver foxes they make into adorable fur hats and coats.

And yet PeTA refuse to protest it. Maybe they understand how important the fur trade is to Russia and their bestest pal Putin. Or maybe they’re scared. You decide.

A belated post, I know, but that happens to be characteristic of the disaster area that is me. Yes, that’s right; in the UK, Jeeves, lovable English gentlemanly mascot of search engine Ask, has returned after three years of retirement. Turns out the public loved the dear just too much to let him go for any longer than a few years. Still, he seems pretty happy to be back, and has become an incredibly chatty and pleasant fellow.  Not that he wasn’t pleasant before.

Jeeves' new 3D design currently displayed on the UK Ask search

Jeeves' new 3D design currently displayed on the UK Ask search

Jeeves appears to be branching out in what looks to be a fantastic advertisment campaign. He has a Twitter page, so in real-time you can keep up to date with the search engine’s Question Of The Day and Jeeves’ answer to said question, hear the latest news on the whereabouts of Jeeves (usually at special events or sometimes just walkin’ round) or just, you know, chat. He has a Facebook page which is also kept painfully up to date and even includes video and images of special events and Jeeves’ travels in the last three years.

Now, to the question you probably weren’t all that interested in knowing the answer to: Will I be using the Ask search engine in future? My answer: Maybe. I use Google. Everyone uses Google. Google is a good search engine. However, Ask sometimes finds the result I’m looking for and places it on the front page whereas I have to sift through tons of Google pages. The likelihood is I’ll use them both.

Besides, I’m quite charmed by Jeeves, the gentleman’s gentleman. Ask has a personality again, which makes it entertaining and now, the personality is getting out amongst the people, mingling, enjoying the company. It’s a very promising ad campaign. I can almost forgive the people at Ask for taking the endearing butler away in the first place.

P.S.: I’ll probably also still use AskJeeves for the purpose of searching silly questions like “Why is the rum gone?” when I’m bored. Better than using Google for boredom. Which I have done. Ask is better.

I would be so much more motivated to lose weight if they did an exercise class like this. Dancing and treadmills. How much more fun could you get? Anyone willing to help me get eight treadmills, somewhere to exercise and a group of other people who’d like to lose weight in a fun way?

Doctors should prescribe treadmill-dancing.

I’ve been concerned after going to see Watchmen (brilliant film, highly recommended) that Rorschach is becoming the new Joker. Not in regards to his characterisation; they couldn’t be further apart from one another there. No, my problem is that Rorschach has, rather sadly, become a target of the fangirls. Yes, the very same ones who throw themselves at anything tragic and hobo-esque. Unfortunately for fans of the movie, the graphic novel and good fan fiction, I fear the film adaptation of Watchmen has brought us something awful and inexcusable. Out Of Character Rorschach.

Now, I have already been chastised and antagonised for having an opinion on the out of character Joker fan fiction. I read some of these because I’ve read the summary and think the idea could be handled well. How disappointed I am when I click to read it and it turns out to be a gratuitous soft porn wish fulfilment story. Where did all the good writers and ideas go?

Rorschach is one of those characters who can never be changed, not to mention one repulsed by human responses to anything. If you’ve seen the movie at the very least, you do remember when he walked right by the prostitute without so much as craning his head to look at her boobs? And don’t give me the utter crap that he’s “only interested in women who can help him” because you’re wrong. Rorschach wasn’t even interested in the slightest when the psychologist offered to help get him into a mental asylum. Why would your original character be any different?

If we just move on to appearance and presentation for a ininute, remember that he was shorter than most of the others (not that it matters too much in all honesty), he had red hair and he was not exactly the cleanest.

Now, I love red hair. Regardless of most other aspects of their appearance, I’ll happily pounce at a redhead. But never would I dare to cross Rorschach. Why? Well, for starters, he’d grab me and throw me out of the window or off the roof or down the sewer, depending on where we happened to encounter one another when I suddenly felt an onset of “Out Of Character”itis.  Then there’s the fact that he obviously doesn’t care for himself whatsoever. I recall laughing as one of the officers trying to control Rorschach as they wrenched the mask off his head complained of his foul odour. Not really something I want to get involved in. And I have the feeling that if I tried to wash him he’d go completely crazy-aggressive on me. He also seems utterly repulsed by women – can you really blame him for that? After all, his mother was an evil skank. He seemed pretty glad when she died. (Graphic novel, seriously folks, go see.)

Also, his preferred face… is a Rorschach test. That’s right ladies, if you ever did manage to cling onto Rorschach, you’d wake up next to an inkblot every day for the rest of your life. And don’t think you can convince him to remove it, because you can’t. And no, in the movie he didn’t bloody remove it, he lifted it to eat. He may be crazy but he’s not stupid.

I had better not damn well see any “he must care for girls – his reaction to that little girl’s horrific death proves it!” because it doesn’t. It proves that when he had a shred of sanity left he felt for the innocent and it disgusted him to the core that someone could do such a thing.

That’s all I have to say on the matter just now. If you must attack me for my observations and opinions, go ahead. I’ve developed a very thick skin over such matters.

GoAnimate is a wonderful website; essentially the lazy would-be filmmaker’s haven. I personally love it and its Star Treky goodness. Because of this, I have started to mini Star Trek series. One is the Adventures of Pavel Chekov, a work in progress. You can see the title animation by clicking below, and a couple of short Chekov clips. The second is Star Trek Shorts, a nostalgic look upon the clichés and trademarks of the original Star Trek series. You can view the first film by clicking below. [Note: Each film opens in a new window]

Enjoy! And remember to visit GoAnimate.com – it’s oh so much fun.

Title Sequence [The Adventures of Pavel Chekov]
Getting-On-My-Nerves Pinch
Chekov Snaps
Star Trek Shorts Episode One: Conversation [Kirk + Spock]